Legal Opinion
Versata Software, Inc. v. Sap America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 1, 2013No. 2012-1029, 2012-1049PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
After a jury verdict of infringement with an award of damages in favor of Versata Software, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc., and Versata Computer Industry Solutions, Inc. (collectively “Versata”), SAP America, Inc. and SAP AG (collectively “SAP”) appeal. Ultimately, the trial court found no infringement of the U.S. Patent No. 5,878,400. The jury found infringement of three claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350. Subsequently, the trial court denied SAP’s motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) or a new trial, awarded prejudgment interest, and entered a permanent…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Eve-Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.