Legal Opinion
Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1978No. 75-2417PublishedCited by 352 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court, Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc., C.A. Nos. 4935 and G293-71 (W.D.Mich. Sept. 15, 1975), adopting, with an unpublished opinion, the report of the special master awarding plaintiff, as dam ages for patent infringement, a reasonable royalty of 2 1 A%. We reverse and remand.
Litigation Background
In 1964 plaintiff Panduit Corp. (Panduit) sued defendant Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc. (Stahlin) for infringement of Panduit’s Walch patent No. 3,024,301, covering duct for wiring of electrical control systems. In 1969,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by352 opinions
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Pall Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Micron Separations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
347 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.