Legal Opinion
Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 16, 2014No. 2013-1489PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
Apple Inc. appeals from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in which a jury found that Apple infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135 (“'135 patent”), 7,418,504 (“'504 patent”), 7,490,151 (“'151 patent”), and 7,921,211 (“'211 patent”). The jury further found that none of the infringed claims were invalid and awarded damages to plaintiffs-appellees VirnetX, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”) in the amount of $368,160,000.
For the reasons that follow, we affirm the jury’s findings that none of the asserted…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Eve-Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Astrazeneca Ab v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.