Legal Opinion
Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 21, 2017No. 2016-2607; 2016-2650PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Presidio filed suit against American Technical Ceramics Corp. (“ATC”) for patent infringement in the District Court for the Southern District of California. After separate jury and bench trials, the district court held the asserted claims were infringed and not invalid, and granted a permanent injunction. The district court limited damages due to intervening rights.
We affirm the district court’s holdings that the claims are not indefinite and that ATC is entitled to absolute intervening rights because a substantive amendment was made during reexamination. We conclude that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Polara Engineering Inc v. Campbell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Anza Technology, Inc. v. Mushkin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Zimmer Surgical, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/SDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.