Legal Opinion

State ex rel. White v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1973No. 72-628PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoRRigan, J.

Appellants submit two propositions of law, either of which, if accepted by this court, would bar the exercise of the trial court’s discretion in considering the award of attorney fees..

Appellants’ first proposition of law urges that the present action is not a taxpayer’s action within the meaning of R. C. 733.59.

This court has defined the word “taxpayer,” as used in R. C. 733.59, in State, ex rel. Nimon, v. Springdale (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 1. Paragraph two of the syllabus states:

“The word, ‘taxpayer,’ as used in Section 733.59, Revised Code, contemplates and includes any person who, in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nimon v. Village of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Brauer v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API