Legal Opinion

City of Pasadena v. Chamberlain

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12888PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is a proceeding wherein the City of Pasadena, a municipal corporation, applies for a writ of mandate directed to the respondent, as the city clerk of said City, requiring her, in her official capacity, to certify to the passage and content of a certain ordinance, theretofore adopted by the city council of said City, and to transmit a certified copy thereof to the chief executive officer of each of the several municipalities referred to in said ordinance, in accordance with the terms thereof and of a certain act of the legislature, known and referred to herein as the “Metropolitan Water…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Henshaw v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Pixley v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Wores v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City of Santa Clara v. Von RaesfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API