Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Rogers v. Letford

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1938No. 14,254PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto upon information of the Attorney General to try the right of respondents to occupy the office and exercise the duties-of directors of Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, organized under the provisions of the Water Conservancy Act of Colorado, chapter 266, S. L. 1937, by the findings and decree of the district court of the Eighth Judicial District sitting in and for Weld county. This action is permissible under section 3, article VI of the Constitution, is of the nature of a common law proceeding searching the entire record, and is not…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. Baum v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API