Legal Opinion

Pixley v. Saunders

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1914No. S.F. No. 6024PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Upon the last submission of this case to the court in Bank the following opinion was then adopted:

Plaintiffs, who are the owners of a tract of land in Marin County known as the Pixley Ranch, brought this action to restrain the tax-collector from selling said property for delinquent taxes levied thereon by the authorities of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County. From a judgment upholding the validity of the tax an appeal is taken. And there is also an appeal from the order dissolving the injunction whereby the tax-collector was restrained .from proceeding to sell the property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Donnelly v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. State ex rel. Baltzell v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City of Santa Clara v. Von RaesfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API