Legal Opinion
O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1938No. Civ. No. 1843PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a motion to recall the remittitur issued by the clerk of this court on July 14, 1938, and to strike therefrom the words, “Appellant to recover costs on appeal. ’ ’
Plaintiffs instituted an action in the Superior Court of Kern County to recover damages for breach of contract. They were awarded judgment in the sum of $10,158.24. Defendant appealed from the entire judgment and presented a complete record on appeal bearing our Civil Number 1843. We will refer to this case as defendant’s appeal. Plaintiffs appealed from the portion of the judgment which fixed their damages at $10,158.24.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- United States v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
- O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Robinett v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. GradowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Harmon v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. GradowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. GradowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Johnson v. SmithAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1954