Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. Gradow
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
The primary issue raised in defendant’s appeal is whether costs awarded after a successful appeal were properly considered pre-offer costs in determining whether the plaintiff received a more favorable result at trial after rejecting an offer of settlement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998. We affirm the trial court’s finding those costs should be included in determining plaintiffs net recovery in this case. We dismiss plaintiff’s appeal as untimely.
Facts and Proceedings Below
In 1982, Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund 1-1973, a California…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Grant v. List & LathropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. PietakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Generale Bank Nederland, N v. v. Eyes of Beholder Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- CC-California Plaza Associates v. Paller & GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.