Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. Gradow
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
WOODS (Fred), J.,
Concurring and Dissenting. I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds that the award of $4,153.53 to plaintiff as costs on the prior appeal must be included in the recovery obtained in the second trial for purposes of determining whether plaintiff was a prevailing party pursuant to defendant’s offer under section 998 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. The majority opines that since the defendant prevailed upon plaintiff to defer collection of the previously awarded costs, such costs must necessarily be included in the calculation of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Supera v. Moreland Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938