Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Stansbury

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12827PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In an action entitled as above, a reversal of the judgment for respondent was had in the appellate court. (62 Cal. App. 336 [217 Pac. 91].) This reversal carried with it costs of appeal and thereafter on the third day of August, 1923, pursuant to the' remittitur in that case, judgment for appellants was entered in the sum of $1242.55, which judgment became ■ final and remained unsatisfied, except for a credit of $77.10 entered thereon on March 2, 1925.

A second trial of the principal cause was had, which resulted on August 10, 1927, in a judgment in favor of respondent Stansbury carrying only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weile v. SturtevantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Erlich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. GradowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Supera v. Moreland Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Meserve v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API