Legal Opinion

Robinett v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1914No. S.F. No. 6376PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. W. M. Conley, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was commenced to foreclose a mechanic’s lien in the sum of $97.50 on property belonging to the defendant. The lien claim and the complaint both charged upon an oral contract to pay the reasonable market value of the work done and materials furnished and alleged that this reasonable value was the sum of $97.50. The answer asserted a specific agreement on the part of the plaintiff to furnish the material and do the work in question for the sum of sixty dollars and pleaded an offer in writing to allow judgment to be taken in that sum (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 997).

The court found the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Mannix v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. P. A. Buell & Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cook v. WinklepleckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Harvard Investment Co. v. Gap Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Bennett v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Shain v. City of AlbanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API