Legal Opinion
O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1938No. Civ. 1843PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action for damages for breach of contract for the sale of milk. Plaintiffs had judgment and defendant has appealed.
Plaintiffs were dairymen in Kern County. They produced milk which they sold to defendant, a distributor of milk and milk products, under a written contract between defendant’s predecessor and plaintiffs. The contract was dated March 2'6, 1929, and had been executed by the Kern County Creameries & Farm Company, defendant’s predecessor, party of the first part, and plaintiffs, parties of the second part. Defendant assumed all the obligations of the contract which had…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- B. L. Metcalf General Contractor, Inc. v. Earl Erne, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Maguire v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.