In re Hooker
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Judge
Four of the twenty claims in appellant’s application for a patent for improvements in a Photo-Electric Marksmanship Device were rejected by the Primary Examiner in the Patent Office, the remaining sixteen claims being allowed. That rejection was affirmed by the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office. The basis of rejection was that of lack of patentability over the prior art. The inventor has appealed to this court from that rejection and its affirmation by the Board of Appeals. E. S. 4911, 35 U. S. C. A. 59a.
The prior art references cited by the Patent Office tribunals are:
Foisy, 2,042,174,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re CarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- In re StacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re WillifordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re RockwellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- In re EganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Application of Bernard HarmonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of Don CornishCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of HansenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of HansenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950