Legal Opinion

In re Egan

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 7, 1947No. 5212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 16, 17, and 19 to 22, inclusive, in appellants’ application for a patent for an invention relating to dispersions of rubber in polar organic liquids.

Claims 11 and 18 in appellants’ application were allowed by the Primary Examiner.

Claims 16,19, and 22 are illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

16. A polar organic liquid dispersion of rubber and a protective colloid which is swellable in the polar organic liquid and insoluble in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HooverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. In re NewtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  3. In re CarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re HookerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  2. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Summer Infant Products, Inc. v. Playskool Baby Products, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API