In re Stacy
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLenkoot, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 4, 5, 6,16,20,22, and 26 of appellant’s application for a patent. Thirteen claims stand allowed.
Claims 5 and 6 are method claims and the others are apparatus claims.
Claims 4 and 5 are illustrative of the subject matter of the claims and read as follows:
4. In a fluid operated motor for drawing metal blanks where if the resistance of the blank to the drawing operation suddenly lessens during the drawing operation, tlie ram element may jump…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In re RockwellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- In re HookerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In re LoblCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.