Legal Opinion
Application of Bernard Harmon
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 25, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6116PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable over the prior art claims 19 through 22, the only remaining claims in appellant’s application for a patent on a “Rotary Hot Wax Spot Carbon Coating Machine and Method.”
The alleged invention relates to a machine which is used to apply carbon coating to limited areas of continuous lengths of paper. It appears that the resulting product is a type of carbon paper which has only select portions thereof coated with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of BisleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re DelanceyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In re MarianiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rota-Carb Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Bernard Harmon v. Frye Manufacturing Company, an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Frank W. Butler and Catalina Yachts, Inc., a California Corporation v. Jack A. Helms, D/B/A Jack A. Helms CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Rota-Carb Corp. v. Frye Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1961