Legal Opinion

Application of Hansen

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 30, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*93JACKSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting method claims 50, 52, 53, 62, and 93, and article claims 55, 58, and 60, of a patent application, serial No. 429,508, filed February 4, 1942, “For High Frequency Power Measuring Device,” as lacking invention over the prior art. Twelve article claims and four method claims were allowed.

Claims 55 and 93 are illustrative of the involved subject matter and read as follows :

“55. In apparatus for measuring high frequency power, a resistor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re StacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. In re WillifordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In re RockwellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  4. In re HookerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Application of HansenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API