In re Carr
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. In the matter of the application of Edward C. Carr. From a decision denying two claims of the application, applicant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a Patent Office decision denying the two claims of an application for patent, claim 1 of which reads as follows:
“1. The • combination with' a receptacle, of a separate container secured therein as a partition to divide the receptacle into a plurality of compartments ; the container being adapted to receive material and keep the material therein separate from other materials in the receptacle.”
Claim. 2 differs from claim 1, in that it contains a limitation that the separate container mentioned in claim 1 is “adjustably” secured, etc.
[1] Applicant’s purpose,…
2Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Application of CraigeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Application of GartnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- In Re HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.