Legal Opinion

In re Carr

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 7, 1924No. 1650PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. In the matter of the application of Edward C. Carr. From a decision denying two claims of the application, applicant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a Patent Office decision denying the two claims of an application for patent, claim 1 of which reads as follows:

“1. The • combination with' a receptacle, of a separate container secured therein as a partition to divide the receptacle into a plurality of compartments ; the container being adapted to receive material and keep the material therein separate from other materials in the receptacle.”

Claim. 2 differs from claim 1, in that it contains a limitation that the separate container mentioned in claim 1 is “adjustably” secured, etc.

[1] Applicant’s purpose,…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Application of CraigeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Application of GartnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. In Re HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API