Legal Opinion
Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 21, 1967No. 60 Civ. 4327PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKEL, District Judge.
In this action, begun on November 3, 1960, plaintiff, Barr Rubber Products Company, sues The Sun Rubber Company for:(1) a declaration of invalidity and noninfringement with respect to United States Patent No. 2,629,134 relating to a method of casting plastic articles, and (2) damages and injunctive relief against alleged violations of the antitrust laws and allegedly unfair competitive practices. 1
Defendant has counterclaimed for a judgment of validity and infringement of the patent.
I. THE PATENT CLAIMS
In brief, non-technical language, the patent in suit covers…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Akron Presform Mold Co. v. McNeil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, M.B.H., Director Max Planck, Institut Fur Kohlenforschung, Hercules IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Kaz Manufacturing Co. v. Northern Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Schimizzi v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.