Legal Opinion

Woodland Park Management, LLC v. City of East Palo Alto Rent Stabilization Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 2010No. A124154PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRUINIERS, J.

—In 1988, the citizens of the City of East Palo Alto adopted by popular vote the Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Good Cause Ordinance (E. Palo Alto Ord. No. 076; RSO). We are asked here to determine whether the RSO permits recovery of attorney fees by a landlord in successful litigation against the City. The trial court held that it does and awarded fees to the landlord. We hold that it does not and reverse the award.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

In 2008, Woodland Park Management, LLC (Woodland Park), which manages residential rental properties subject to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. California School Boards Ass'n v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. California Retail Portfolio Fund Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Hopkins Real Estate GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Tower Lane Properties v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Ganas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Ganas)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. Landry v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Landry)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API