Legal Opinion
Tower Lane Properties v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2014No. B244092PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANEY, Acting P. J.
Respondent Tower Lane Properties (Tower Lane) sought a grading permit from the City of Los Angeles (the City) for constmction of a three-residence family compound over three contiguous hillside lots totaling 85,000 square feet. The City’s engineers conditioned the permit upon compliance with Los Angeles Municipal Code section 91.7006.8.2, which states no grading permit shall be issued for a hillside site larger than 60,000 square feet unless a “tentative tract map” has been approved by a city planner.
Arguing no tentative tract map is required when a builder does not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bruni v. The Edward Thomas Hospitality CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund v. City of San Mateo 9/10/2 Case Details Related Case: A159658California Court of Appeal · 2021
- P. ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- SunCal La Quinta v. Eston CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2022