Legal Opinion
California School Boards Ass'n v. State
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 9, 2011No. D055659PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
When the Legislature enacts a law requiring a local school district to implement a new program or a higher level of service, the California Constitution requires the State of California (State) to pay the cost of the mandate and prohibits the State from transferring the cost to the school district. During the past decade, the Legislature has enacted numerous statutes requiring school districts to implement many new programs and services. *779However, because of budget difficulties, the State has not paid the full cost of these programs and services. Instead, it has sought to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bottini v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Nat'l Asian Am. Coal. v. Newsom, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Am. Indian Health & Servs. Corp. v. Kent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- California High-Speed Rail Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.