Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Bankers' Finance Ass'n

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1928No. 1471PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curirnn.

This ease is here on direct appeal. A motion to dismiss the case, based on several grounds, has been filed herein. The record fails to show that any judgment in the case has ever been entered of record. A number of papers contained in the record on appeal are certified as true and correct. One of these papers purports to be a “judgment” and shows a filing mark of the clerk. But there is nothing on that paper which in any way indicates that it was ever entered of record. Nor is that fact shown in any other part of the record on appeal. The subject was considered in the case of Hahn…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Coffee v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Goodrich v. Big Horn County BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Posvar v. PearceWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Thomas v. BivinWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wyuta Cattle Co. v. ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Cottier v. SullivanWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Snake River Land Co. v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  4. W.H. Holliday v. BundyWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Rayburne v. QueenWyoming Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API