Legal Opinion

Cottier v. Sullivan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1934No. 1817PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Chief Justice.

Respondents moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record on appeal fails to show either the entry of the judgment or the date when it was en tered. Hahn v. Citizens State Bank, 25 Wyo. 467, 171 Pac. 889, 172 Pac. 705, and Goodrich v. Big Horn County Bank, 26 Wyo. 42, 174 Pac. 191, are cited in support of the motion. These cases hold that the record must show both the entry and date of entry of the judgment appealed from. Entry is a prerequisite to the right of appeal, and the date of entry must be shown in order that the court may see whether the steps…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In Re the Appraisal Under the Taxable Transfer Act of the Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  5. G. Ganahl Lumber Co. v. WeinsveigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In Re Big Horn River SystemWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re Estate of MortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. AmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API