Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rayburne v. Queen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1956No. 2744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*397OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · ParkerJustice Parker

Annajean A. Rayburne (appellant), lessee of the N% sec. 34, T. 53 N., R. 62 W., 6th P.M., under a Wyoming grazing lease, to expire February 1, 1955, filed an application for a renewal of the lease on November 24, 1954, about a month after O. H. and Alice Queen (respondents), had filed a conflicting application for rental of the same property. When the commissioner of public lands decided the conflict in favor of the Queens, Rayburne appealed to the board of land commissioners who upheld the commissioner’s decision. Thereupon, Rayburne appealed to the District Court of Crook County.…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Gagnon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Culbertson v. AinsworthWyoming Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Chittim v. Belle Fourche Bentonite Products Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rayburne v. QueenWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Thickman v. SchunkWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Nihi Lewa, Inc. v. Department of Budget & Fiscal ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Nihi Lewa, Inc. v. Department of Budget & Fiscal ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Rayburne v. QueenWyoming Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API