Legal Opinion

Posvar v. Pearce

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1928No. 1473PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

A motion has been filed in this case to dismiss the proceeding in error for the reason that it appears from the bill of exceptions and the records in the case that there is nothing for the court to decide because of the fact that no motion for a new trial is embodied in the bill of exceptions, and that it does not appear therefrom what was done with the motion, or that any exception was taken to the action of the court overruling it.

In some cases, as pointed out in Schmidt v. Bank, 29 Wyo. 260, 212 Pac. 651, proceedings in error may be reviewed without a bill of exceptions, and hence without…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. OttWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. School District No. 3 v. Western Tube Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Callahan v. HouckWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Bank of Chadron v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Freeburgh v. LamoureuxWyoming Supreme Court · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merritt v. MerrittWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Schaffer v. Standard Timber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Miracle v. Barker Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lester A. York v. John P. JamesWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Barnett v. Bankers' Finance Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API