Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Bivin

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1925No. 1281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PotteR, Chief Justice.

This case is here tinder the direct appeal statute and has been heard upon motion to dismiss, upon the stated ground that the record for the appeal was not prepared and filed in the district court within the time allowed by statute.

The “direct appeal” statute, so called therein, provides a method of appeal from the district courts to this court, “separate and independent” from the provisions for the review of civil and criminal causes on proceedings in error. Comp. Stat. 1920, Secs. 6401, 6415. It requires that the appeal be taken by serving and filing notice in writing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Mitter v. Black Diamond Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Coffee v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Spencer v. LoewensteinWyoming Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cottier v. SullivanWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Barnett v. Bankers' Finance Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lion Coal Co. v. ContasWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  4. W.H. Holliday v. BundyWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Merchants' National Bank of Omaha v. AyersWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API