Legal Opinion
Aguilar v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 24, 1993No. C2-93-484PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Respondent Johnny Aguilar commenced this action against appellant Texas Farmers Insurance Company (Texas Farmers) asserting that a choice of law analysis was necessary, that Minnesota law applied, and that, under Minnesota law, underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits were to be provided on an “add on” basis. Texas Farmers moved for summary judgment. Texas Farmers agreed that Minnesota law applied, but asserted that, under Minnesota law, the insurance policy was to be construed according to its terms, including provision of UIM benefits on a “difference of limits” basis.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Gimmestad v. GimmestadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Hedin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Burgie v. League General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Toni Brill v. Mid-Century Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Johnson v. CummiskeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Warthan v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Ziegelmann v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.