Legal Opinion

People v. Scroggins

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1987No. D004761PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J.

David Lee Scroggins pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 1 § 496, subd. 1) in return for a commitment not to oppose local time. On appeal from the ensuing judgment, he seeks to overturn a condition of probation that he pay restitution to various burglary victims of $2,366 during his five-year period of probation. He also complains on appeal he was denied a hearing to establish the actual losses proximately caused by his criminal conduct and he was not given full credit for time he had already served.

Facts

On December 13 and 14, 1985, burglaries occurred in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. HartleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. In Re JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. People v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API