Legal Opinion

People v. Foster

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1993No. Docket Nos. E010244, E011242PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*943Opinion

DABNEY, J.

A jury found defendant Terry Foster guilty of residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459)1 and not guilty of arson (§451, subd. (b)). The court imposed five years’ supervised probation on the conditions, among others, that Foster (1) pay a $4,000 restitution fine, to be stayed upon successful completion of probation; (2) serve 365 days in county jail; (3) pay $7,040 plus a 10 percent fee as restitution to Farmers Insurance Company; and (4) pay $8,000 plus a 10 percent fee as restitution to the victim.

On appeal, Foster claims that: (1) in ordering restitution to the victim, the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. KEICHLERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. People v. GemelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API