Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1989No. C004293PublishedCited by 58 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARLER, J.

Charged with possession of cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5) and a prior conviction for a drug related offense (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.2), defendant was found guilty by a jury of the possession offense and admitted the prior conviction. He was sentenced to the middle term of four years for the possession and a consecutive term of three years for the prior conviction enhancement. In addition, defendant’s probation on the prior offense was revoked and he received a concurrent four-year term. He appeals claiming violation of double jeopardy as to the prior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. ScrogginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. In Re AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. RajanayagamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. FaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. BravoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API