Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fulton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 2003No. D036550PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, J.

Nathan K. Fulton pled guilty to driving while under the influence of alcohol, causing injury. The trial court granted Fulton probation and ordered him to pay the victim restitution, including $25,000 in attorney fees the victim incurred pursuing a personal injury action against Fulton for economic and noneconomic damages sustained as a result of Fulton’s criminal conduct. (Pen. Code, § 1202.4.)

Fulton’s sole appellate challenge concerns the restitution award. Fulton contends the amount of the attorney fees awarded was improper because a portion of that award reflected attorney…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. BabbittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. GemelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. ProsserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API