Legal Opinion

People v. Richards

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1976No. Crim. 17985PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We hold here that absent extraordinary circumstances probation for a defendant may not be conditioned on restitution of sums involved in a purported crime of which he was acquitted.

*617Defendant was charged with two counts of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 484) arising out of the sale of mining claims and quitclaim deeds. The People presented evidence that William Ward and Juanita Garbuio, in separate transactions, purchased documents at a public auction because defendant, who executed the sales, led them to believe they were buying sufficient interests to enable them to hunt, fish, or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API