People v. Richards
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We hold here that absent extraordinary circumstances probation for a defendant may not be conditioned on restitution of sums involved in a purported crime of which he was acquitted.
*617Defendant was charged with two counts of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 484) arising out of the sale of mining claims and quitclaim deeds. The People presented evidence that William Ward and Juanita Garbuio, in separate transactions, purchased documents at a public auction because defendant, who executed the sales, led them to believe they were buying sufficient interests to enable them to hunt, fish, or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.