Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1986No. F006372PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

Petitioner, an attorney at law, was sentenced to 10 days in jail for 2 instances of contempt of court, the maximum allowable under Code of Civil Procedure section 1218. The circumstances behind the contempt charges are not relevant to the petition, but may be found in In re Jackson (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 773 [216 Cal.Rptr. 539].

The court sentenced petitioner to serve his ten days over four weekends, as follows:

6 p.m. Friday, October 18, 1985, to 4 a.m. on Monday, October 21, 1985, for a total of three days.

6 p.m. Friday, October 25, 1985, to 4 a.m. on Monday, October 28,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. FusaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re KarpfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. FaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. BravoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. ScrogginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API