Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1967No. Crim. 5989PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court modifying the terms of his probation in connection with his previous conviction of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487). Defendant contends that the trial court invalidly increased the amount of restitution which he must pay as a condition of his probation.

Defendant was found guilty of unlawfully taking $821.60 from Robert J. Keefe. Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was granted probation for three years on October 1, 1963. In granting probation, pursuant to a recommendation by the probation officer, the trial court ordered that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. LippnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. In Re BineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API