Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fairbairn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 14, 2011No. A10-0977PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (“the Director”) filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Jo M. Fairbairn for both the intentional and unintentional misappropriation of client trust account funds. After a hearing on the petition, the referee recommended a 6-month suspension, a prohibition on access to client trust funds, and payment of $900 in costs. The Director disputes several of the referee’s *739findings of facts, the referee’s failure to find aggravating factors, and the recommended sanction. The Director argues that Fairbairn…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by47 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrigsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.