Legal Opinion
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 11, 2012No. A11-0976PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (“Director”) filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Stephen Vincent *839Grigsby violated Rules 1.2(a),1 3.3(a)(1),2 4.1,3 8.4(c)4 and (d),5 and 5.5(a),6 Minn. R. Prof. Conduct, by, without prior authorization, writing and filing an appellate brief for a former client while his privilege to practice law was suspended, signing the former client’s name to the brief, and indicating that the former client was pro se. Following an evidentiary hearing, the referee concluded that Grigsby committed the…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by25 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against NwaneriSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Duane A. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 55128Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mpatanishi Syanaloli TAYARI-GARRETT, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 342075Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In re Disciplinary Action Against JaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.