Legal Opinion
Schreck v. City of Stamford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 24, 2002No. AC 21984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*498 Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff, Robert Schreck, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board), affirming the commissioner’s decision in favor of the defendant city of Stamford (city) on its claim for credit for the amount of settlements entered by the plaintiff. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the board improperly found that he waived his right to enforce the 120 day time limit prescribed by General Statutes § 31-300.1 We reverse the decision of the board and remand the case for a new hearing.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Stewart v. Tunxis Service CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Schreck v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Building Supply Corp. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Evanuska v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. ReddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- McCurry v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Evanuska v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007