Legal Opinion

Schreck v. City of Stamford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 14, 1999No. SC 16061PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

In this certified appeal, we must decide whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that, under General Statutes § 31-301 (a),1 the ten day period for a party to appeal to the compensation review board (board) from an adverse decision of a workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) begins to run on the date that the commissioner sends notice of the decision to the party,2 rather than to the party’s counsel. We conclude that the ten day limitation period commences on the date that notice is sent to the party’s counsel. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Duni v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Connor v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Modern Cigarette, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API