Legal Opinion
State v. Reddy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 24, 2012No. AC 33324PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The respondent, Walter Reddy III, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding that he posed a risk of imminent personal injury to other individuals and ordering that his firearms be seized for a period of one year pursuant to General Statutes § 29-38c. On appeal, both the respondent and the state are in accord that the judgment of the court should be reversed. We agree with the parties and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our discussion. On February 8, 2011, officers from the Weston…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Butts v. BysiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. BuchmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. FletcherConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Aldin Associates Ltd. Partnership v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Hope v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016