Legal Opinion
Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 24, 1990No. 13871PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether a party’s prejudgment refusal to consent to an extension of time deprives a trial court of personal jurisdiction to render a judgment beyond the 120 day period allowed under General Statutes § Sl-lSSb.1 The plaintiff, Linda Waterman, initiated this action to recover damages on a defaulted promissory note and on related allegations of fiscal misconduct from the defendants, United Caribbean, Inc., Carl H. Freyer and Freyer Corporation. The trial court rendered judgment, beyond the 120 day period of § 51-183b, in favor of the plaintiff against the named…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foley v. George A. Douglas & Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Whitaker v. Cannon Mills Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Borden v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Cheshire Brass Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Bogaert v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hillcrest AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- AFSCME, Council 4, Local 704 v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.