Legal Opinion

McCurry v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 7, 2011No. 1 CA-IC 10-0048PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 After his injury, Stephen McCurry filed a workers’ compensation claim. The Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) subsequently determined that his claim was noncompensable. He appeals, and, in our special action review, we are asked to decide whether the statutory requirement that an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) issue a decision within thirty days after a hearing is mandatory and jurisdictional. 1 Because the thirty-day provision in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-942(A) (1995) is not jurisdictional, we affirm the Award and Decision Upon Review…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Demaris v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Appeal of MartinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Scottie-Craft Boat Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Ronald Coleman v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Berryhill v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API