McCurry v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 After his injury, Stephen McCurry filed a workers’ compensation claim. The Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) subsequently determined that his claim was noncompensable. He appeals, and, in our special action review, we are asked to decide whether the statutory requirement that an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) issue a decision within thirty days after a hearing is mandatory and jurisdictional. 1 Because the thirty-day provision in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-942(A) (1995) is not jurisdictional, we affirm the Award and Decision Upon Review…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Demaris v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Appeal of MartinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Scottie-Craft Boat Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Ronald Coleman v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Berryhill v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013