Legal Opinion
Evanuska v. City of Danbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 2, 2007No. AC 27263PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether a volunteer firefighter’s participation in the repair of his station house’s roof is an activity that falls within the definition of “fire duties” under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et. seq. The plaintiffs, volunteer firefighters Douglas Eva-nuska and Paul Williams,1 appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) that their injuries were not compensable under General Statutes § 7-314a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kinsey v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Tracy v. Scherwitzky Gutter Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Board of Education v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Walter v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Schreck v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Evanuska v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Evanuska v. CITY OF DANBURYSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Gold Diggers, LLC v. Town of Berlin, Conn.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Evanuska v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Evanuska v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007