Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1982No. 81-419PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

The question presented is whether the $200 ceiling on weekly income loss benefits, provided by Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 3 (1980), is subject to stacking. The district court permitted the insured to stack the weekly rate of payment. We affirm.

Plaintiff Herbert L. Peterson sustained a back injury while departing from his car on April 19, 1979. At the time of the injury, each of Peterson’s four motor vehicles was insured through a policy issued by defendant Iowa Mutual.

Peterson filed claims with Iowa Mutual for various items of economic loss caused by the injury. Medical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Weiss v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Rana v. Bishop Ins. of Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API