Peterson v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
The question presented is whether the $200 ceiling on weekly income loss benefits, provided by Minn.Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 3 (1980), is subject to stacking. The district court permitted the insured to stack the weekly rate of payment. We affirm.
Plaintiff Herbert L. Peterson sustained a back injury while departing from his car on April 19, 1979. At the time of the injury, each of Peterson’s four motor vehicles was insured through a policy issued by defendant Iowa Mutual.
Peterson filed claims with Iowa Mutual for various items of economic loss caused by the injury. Medical…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Weiss v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Rana v. Bishop Ins. of Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.