Weiss v. Farmers Insurance Group
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of St. Louis County in favor of respondent Farmers Insurance Group, the defendant below, on cross-motions for summary judgment. We affirm.
The pertinent facts stipulated to the trial court are as follows:
WHEREAS, the above entitled action was commenced by plaintiff to recover reimbursement under the No-Fault Act for medical expense incurred as a result of an automobile accident wherein she was struck as a pedestrian, and
WHEREAS, defendant alleges plaintiff is entitled to recover only a portion of the medical expense incurred,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Pleitgen Ex Rel. Pleitgen v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Koons v. National Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Peterson v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982