Legal Opinion

Rana v. Bishop Ins. of Hawaii, Inc.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1985No. 10097PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

Plaintiff Yash Rana (Rana) appeals from the summary judgment in favor of Bishop Insurance of Hawaii, Inc. (Bishop), which dismissed Rana’s complaint seeking payments of no-fault earnings loss benefits based on “stacking” no-fault insurance coverage on the seven automobiles owned by him and insured by Bishop. Rana also appeals from the order denying his motion for allowance of attorney’s fees and costs.

The issues on appeal and our answers are:

1. Whether the Hawaii no-fault law, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 294 (1976, as amended) (No-Fault Law),…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of CaraangHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc. v. MatayoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kaiama v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Alohacare v. Department of Human Services, State of Hawaii.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hubbell v. IsekeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API