Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1983No. C1-82-741PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This appeal raises, first, the factual issue whether the insurer complied with the mandatory offer of optional insurance coverages to its insured as required by the statute then in force, and, second, issues as to stacking of optional coverages in a commercial garage liability policy. We affirm the trial court’s finding that the insurer did not comply with the requirements of the mandatory offer. As to the trial court’s rulings on stacking, we reverse the ruling allowing stacking of no-fault benefits and we affirm the ruling allowing stacking of underin-sured motorist…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Harris v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cossitt v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API