Legal Opinion

Rieman v. Joubert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1985No. C3-84-1412PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This appeal illustrates the importance of serving a notice of filing of a trial court decision in post-trial motion practice. On the facts of this case, we hold that defendant waived service of notice of filing and, therefore, his motion for a new trial brought more than 15 days after his waiver was untimely.

Plaintiff-respondent William C. Rieman, Jr., sued defendant-appellant Jarrel D. Jou-bert for breach of an oral contract in Hen-nepin County Municipal Court. After a bench trial, the trial court decided in plaintiffs favor and, on August 30, 1983, filed its findings of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Pamida, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. O'BRIEN v. WendtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. In Re Judicial Ditch No. 2, Houston CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Differt v. RendahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Maurin v. CarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marriage of Mingen v. MingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Levine v. HauserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re the Establishment of County Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Barron v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API