Rieman v. Joubert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This appeal illustrates the importance of serving a notice of filing of a trial court decision in post-trial motion practice. On the facts of this case, we hold that defendant waived service of notice of filing and, therefore, his motion for a new trial brought more than 15 days after his waiver was untimely.
Plaintiff-respondent William C. Rieman, Jr., sued defendant-appellant Jarrel D. Jou-bert for breach of an oral contract in Hen-nepin County Municipal Court. After a bench trial, the trial court decided in plaintiffs favor and, on August 30, 1983, filed its findings of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowman v. Pamida, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- O'BRIEN v. WendtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 2, Houston CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Differt v. RendahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Maurin v. CarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marriage of Mingen v. MingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Levine v. HauserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re the Establishment of County Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Barron v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Biba Information Processing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.